How the fact that postfix unary having higher precedence than prefix would group differently an expression? [closed]
For instance in the expression a+b*c, applying precedence (grouping) we get a+(b*c) because * has higher precedence than +. Nonetheless, I'm struggling to understand the case in which we'd decide to group differently some expression due to the fact that, say postfix ++ had higher precedence than prefix ++. The only thing that came up to my mind was a+++b which becomes (a++)+b, but I'm not sure if this would be the best example to illustrate precedence hierarchy between these two operators (even if it serves such purpose).
![How the fact that postfix unary having higher precedence than prefix would group differently an expression? [closed]](https://cdn.sstatic.net/Sites/softwareengineering/Img/apple-touch-icon@2.png?v=1ef7363febba)
For instance in the expression a+b*c, applying precedence (grouping) we get a+(b*c) because * has higher precedence than +. Nonetheless, I'm struggling to understand the case in which we'd decide to group differently some expression due to the fact that, say postfix ++ had higher precedence than prefix ++. The only thing that came up to my mind was a+++b which becomes (a++)+b, but I'm not sure if this would be the best example to illustrate precedence hierarchy between these two operators (even if it serves such purpose).
What's Your Reaction?
